| Table 10.1 Year 2005 discharges from OPIOID REPLACEMENT DETOXIFICATION1 by State, according to reason for discharge: TEDS 2005 Number and percent distribution |
||||||||||||
| [Based on linked admission and discharge data reported to TEDS by 34 States and jurisdictions. Comparisons among States should be made with caution.] | ||||||||||||
| State | Number | Percent distribution | ||||||||||
| All dis- charges |
Reason for discharge, transfer, or discontinuance of treatment |
Total | Reason for
discharge, transfer, or discontinuance of treatment |
|||||||||
| Com- pleted |
Trans- ferred |
Dropped
out |
Termi- nated |
Other |
Com- pleted |
Trans- ferred |
Dropped
out |
Termi- nated |
Other |
|||
| Total | 23,632 | 8,270 | 4,618 | 8,532 | 724 | 1,488 | 100.0 | 35.0 | 19.5 | 36.1 | 3.1 | 6.3 |
| Arizona2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Arkansas | 96 | 62 | 16 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 100.0 | 64.6 | 16.7 | 14.6 | 3.1 | 1.0 |
| California | 12,187 | 2,673 | 1,786 | 6,444 | - - | 1,284 | 100.0 | 21.9 | 14.7 | 52.9 | - - | 10.5 |
| Colorado2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Connecticut2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Florida | 109 | 93 | - - | 14 | - - | 2 | 100.0 | 85.3 | - - | 12.8 | - - | 1.8 |
| Georgia | 8,281 | 4,826 | 2,112 | 797 | 525 | 21 | 100.0 | 58.3 | 25.5 | 9.6 | 6.3 | 0.3 |
| Hawaii2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Idaho | 8 | 2 | - - | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 25.0 | - - | 25.0 | 25.0 | 25.0 |
| Illinois | 416 | 106 | 177 | 129 | 4 | - - | 100.0 | 25.5 | 42.5 | 31.0 | 1.0 | - - |
| Iowa | 3 | 2 | 1 | - - | - - | - - | 100.0 | 66.7 | 33.3 | - - | - - | - - |
| Kansas2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Maine3 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Maryland | 297 | 42 | 114 | 95 | 31 | 15 | 100.0 | 14.1 | 38.4 | 32.0 | 10.4 | 5.1 |
| Massachusetts2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Michigan | 395 | 16 | 311 | 61 | 2 | 5 | 100.0 | 4.1 | 78.7 | 15.4 | 0.5 | 1.3 |
| Minnesota2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Mississippi3 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Missouri | 3 | 1 | - - | - - | 2 | - - | 100.0 | 33.3 | - - | - - | 66.7 | - - |
| Montana2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Nebraska | 8 | 4 | 2 | - - | - - | 2 | 100.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | - - | - - | 25.0 |
| New Hampshire | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 100.0 | 44.4 | 11.1 | 11.1 | 22.2 | 11.1 |
| New Jersey | 1,415 | 384 | 8 | 822 | 78 | 123 | 100.0 | 27.1 | 0.6 | 58.1 | 5.5 | 8.7 |
| New York2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Ohio | 57 | - - | 28 | 26 | - - | 3 | 100.0 | - - | 49.1 | 45.6 | - - | 5.3 |
| Oklahoma2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Oregon | 107 | 10 | 20 | 43 | 22 | 12 | 100.0 | 9.3 | 18.7 | 40.2 | 20.6 | 11.2 |
| Rhode Island | 165 | 24 | 32 | 60 | 47 | 2 | 100.0 | 14.5 | 19.4 | 36.4 | 28.5 | 1.2 |
| South Carolina2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| South Dakota | 13 | 10 | 2 | - - | - - | 1 | 100.0 | 76.9 | 15.4 | - - | - - | 7.7 |
| Tennessee | 8 | 2 | 5 | - - | - - | 1 | 100.0 | 25.0 | 62.5 | - - | - - | 12.5 |
| Texas2 | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - | - - |
| Utah | 49 | 9 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 100.0 | 18.4 | 4.1 | 40.8 | 12.2 | 24.5 |
| Virginia | 6 | - - | 1 | 4 | - - | 1 | 100.0 | - - | 16.7 | 66.7 | - - | 16.7 |
| 1 Includes ambulatory detoxification (n = 13,369; 57 percent), free-standing residential detoxification (n = 10,002; 42 percent), and hospital detoxification (n = 261; 1 percent) where opioid replacement therapy was planned. | ||||||||||||
| 2 Opioid replacement detoxification was not offered, or was not reportable to TEDS. | ||||||||||||
| 3 Opioid replacement detoxification admissions were reported, but there were no linkable discharge records. | ||||||||||||
| - - Quantity is zero. | ||||||||||||
| SOURCE: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS). Data received through 10.03.06. | ||||||||||||